My life in 5 books

In a recent email I received from The Listserve (an email lottery where one person a day wins a chance to write to the growing list of subscribers on the Listserve), a stranger shared with me their life in 5 books. I felt so compelled to respond and the below is my own attempt to describe my life in 5 books.

1) As a child
The Velveteen Rabbit

If my back were the size of a 9 foot canvas, I'd probably get this tattooed on it:

“What is REAL?” asked the Rabbit one day, when they were lying side by side near the nursery fender, before Nana came to tidy the room. “Does it mean having things that buzz inside you and a stick-out handle?”

“Real isn’t how you are made,” said the Skin Horse. “It’s a thing that happens to you. When a child loves you for a long, long time, not just to play with, but REALLY loves you, then you become Real.”

“Does it hurt?” asked the Rabbit.

“Sometimes,” said the Skin Horse, for he was always truthful. “When you are Real you don’t mind being hurt.”

“Does it happen all at once, like being wound up,” he asked, “or bit by bit?”

“It doesn’t happen all at once,” said the Skin Horse. “You become. It takes a long time. That’s why it doesn’t happen often to people who break easily, or have sharp edges, or who have to be carefully kept. Generally, by the time you are Real, most of your hair has been loved off, and your eyes drop out and you get loose in the joints and very shabby. But these things don’t matter at all, because once you are Real you can’t be ugly, except to people who don’t understand.”

2) Growing Up
A Separate Peace

All things considered, this book is good not great. Well executed, perfect for analysis, but there are dozens of books I'd recommend before this one. However, this was the book I was assigned in 10th grade English class and the paper I wrote was the first A I received on any piece of critical analysis. From that moment on, I knew I was in love with words. Not because of the grade I was given, but because of the agency the act of expository writing gave me. My 10th grade English teacher was the person who taught me the difference between subjectivity and objectivity, that essays didn't have to be 5 paragraphs long, and that standardized testing is full of bullshit. In fact, he was the first person who taught me how to write in first person, and in doing so, I think he taught me how to start taking a stand for what I believed in - whatever that was at the time and whatever that may be in the future. 

3) Still Growing Up
The Harry Potter series

Like many, I literally grew up with Harry (we're the same age, so to speak). But for me, Harry Potter was all about escaping to a different place, and eventually, I started to notice that other people wanted to go there too. I thought that was so cool - that a million different people could have this shared experience even though they experienced this story at different times in their lives, in different places around the world. And eventually, I met a girl at a summer camp who wanted to go there too. And eventually, that girl became the first girl I ever truly liked. I was 17 and we held hands underneath the blanket after the midnight release of the Deathly Hallows. 

4) In School
Decoded

This is Jay-Z's biography. Curve ball, I know. But I graduated with a degree in Race and Ethnicity, and for my senior thesis, I found myself looking for ways to weave in elements of pop culture that I loved to consume - like hip hop. The subject of the paper - Demystifying the Corporate Hip Hop and Ethnic Hip Hop Binary - examined the tension between the highly commercialized rap ballads of Jay-Z's repertoire and the more real often political themes found in his other works. 

 

5) In my mid-twenties
Still Writing: The Perils and Pleasures of a Creative Life

I've tried just about every form of writing imaginable - poetry, short story, theses. Only recently did I realize that I'm most attracted to the philosophy behind writing and the idea of a daily practice, than I am in actually writing. Nearly a year ago, I went on a 10 day silent meditation retreat. The first book I picked up was Dani Shapiro's Still Writing. She just so happened to be scheduled for a book reading the next evening at the bookstore by my apartment (I had the fortune of meeting her and talking to her for 15 minutes). In one part of the book she mentions how difficult writing is, how difficult the practice of writing is. There are days when she doesn't want to write but she resolves this by knowing that it is the "very act of writing that is generative." 

If I waited to be in the mood to write, I’d barely have a chapbook of material to my name. Who would ever be in the mood to write? Do marathon runners get in the mood to run? Do teachers wake up with the urge to lecture? I don’t know, but I doubt it. My guess is that it’s the very act that is generative. The doing of the thing that makes possible the desire for it. A runner suits up, stretches, begins to run. An inventor trudges down to his workroom, closing the door behind him. A writer sits in her writing space, setting aside the time to be alone with her work. Is she inspired doing it? Very possibly not. Is she distracted, bored, lonely, in need of stimulation? Oh, absolutely, without a doubt it’s hard to sit there. Who wants to sit there? Something nags at the edges of her mind. Should she make soup for dinner tonight? She’s on the verge of jumping up from her chair – in which case all will be lost – but wait. Suddenly she remembers: this is her hour (or two, or three). This is her habit, her job, her discipline. Think of a ballet dancer at the barre. Plie, eleve, battement tendu. She is practicing, because she knows that there is no difference between practice and art. The practice is the art.

I think I'm struck by the optimism behind this philosophy. Inertia starts somewhere, is the takeaway for me. And right now, it's working. 

 

Thanks Gabriella, for the inspiration. 

Robot economy and technological unemployment

The latest from Robot Economy (yes, that's a real thing. check it out here) takes an interesting look back on the dawn of the information age, going as far back as the computer's birth:

On March 28, 1955, Time magazine reported on a new generation of machinery called computers. The cover featured a drawing of IBM’s Thomas Watson, Jr. in front of a cartoonish robot drawn by Boris Artzybasheff, over a headline that read, “Clink. Clank. Think.” 

Time equated the IBM computer with the advance of civilization. “The prospects for mankind are truly dazzling,” the article said. “Automation of industry will mean new reaches of leisure, new wealth, new dignity for the laboring man.”

The original reporting of the computer isn't all too different from John Maynard Keynes' Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. That essay from Keynes spawned the theory of technological unemployment, the notion that unemployment is produced due to our discover of means of economising the use of labour outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labour. 

There are two sides of the coin in this argument. 

1) Technology automates tasks and responsibilities otherwise fulfilled by human resources, and this results in job outsourcing. 

The International Labor Organization (ILO) reports 200 million unemployed people worldwide in 2014. Robot Economy makes a soft argument that the bulk of jobs employed are coming from banks, insurance companies, travel agents, and retail. And most of these service industries rely heavily on software automation to run repetitive tasks. 

2) The productivity output gained from technology actually opens up working hours to be filled by information workers, resulting in more job opportunities.

In defense of the second argument are the 76 companies that have implemented robots and also increased employees by over 294,000 over the last 3 years. In this stat pointed out by Robot Economy. robots are defined as a mechanical hardware and software device that incorporates movement/action. Folks like Amazon have multiplied employees by a factor of four over the past three years, though I'm sure not all jobs created at the company can be directly attributed to robotics, with needs in other areas of the company. 

Bottom Line (at least, according to RobotEconomics): software eats jobs; robotics creates jobs. 

Not that this is new or groundbreaking, but in terms of skillsets desired, accessing a high level of creativity is more valuable than ever and robot-proof, so to speak.